Volume 13 Supplement 1
Considerable differences in the utilisation of antidiabetics between Serbia and Scandinavian countries
© Pavlović et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Published: 17 September 2012
Diabetes mellitus is a major public health concern with devastating human, social and economic impact. It is increasing globally, affecting more than 180 million people worldwide. The objective of our study was to analyse the overall volume of use of antidiabetics in Serbia compared to Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark), chosen for their rational and conservative prescription practice.
Data on consumption of antidiabetics (ATC group A10) in 2010 were extracted from the databases of the representative national authorities. Utilisation of these medicines was measured through the defined daily dose (DDD) unit and the results were expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID).
In 2010, antidiabetics were used at a similar rate in Serbia (47.3 DID) and Scandinavian countries (from 46.5 DID in Sweden to 47.67 DID in Norway), but the share of use of insulins (A10A) and oral antidiabetics (A10B) differed among the observed countries. The proportion of insulin in Serbia was 22.0% of all antidiabetics which is relatively low in comparison with Scandinavian countries (from 36.2% in Denmark to 50.8% in Sweden). Utilisation of long-acting insulins (A10AE) was much lower in Serbia (1.3 DID) compared to Scandinavian countries (range: 2.6–4.6 DID). The share of oral antidiabetics use also differed among these countries. In Serbia, sulfonylureas (A10BB), as a second-line treatment for type 2 diabetes, were used predominantly (55.6%) compared to metformin (44.1%). In Scandinavian countries, metformin, as preffered oral agent for type 2 diabetes and the only medicine from the biguanide class (A10BA), was used at a higher rate than in Serbia (from 51.2% in Denmark to 60.4% in Sweden). New medicinal products with effect on the incretin system (A10BH and A10BX) were also used at a higher rate in Scandinavian countries (range: 0.5–2.5 DID) in comparison to Serbia (0.002 DID).
This cross-national study has demonstrated large differences in the utilisation of various antidiabetics among observed countries that may be attributed to considerable variations in attitudes and habits, especially with regard to the management of type 2 diabetes.
This research was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Serbia, project no. 41012.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.