A review of the differences and similarities between generic drugs and their originator counterparts, including economic benefits associated with usage of generic medicines, using Ireland as a case study
© Dunne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 June 2012
Accepted: 24 December 2012
Published: 5 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zaheer Babar|
|31 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Atholl Johnston|
|6 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Godman|
|30 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Suzanne Dunne|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Atholl Johnston|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Godman|
|10 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zaheer Babar|
|20 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Suzanne Dunne|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Suzanne Dunne|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|22 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|24 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/2050-6511-14-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.