Adverse drug events observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with 100 mg versus 300 mg canagliflozin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 29 December 2016
Accepted: 28 February 2017
Published: 16 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emanuel Raschi|
|24 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabetta Poluzzi|
|3 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pravesh Bundhun|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40360-017-0126-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.