This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Pharmaceutical quality of seven generic Levodopa/Benserazide products compared with original Madopar® / Prolopa®
© Gasser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 December 2012
Accepted: 10 April 2013
Published: 23 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Isabelle Arnet|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Salvatore Amoroso|
|22 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Calabresi|
|25 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Isabelle Arnet|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/2050-6511-14-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.