Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the eligible studies

From: A meta-analysis of the proportion of antimicrobial resistant human Salmonella isolates in Ethiopia

Author

Location

Ys

n

Number of resistant isolates (%)

Amp

Sxt

Chl

Cro

Cip

MDR

[12]

AA

1974-1981

216

nr

0(0)

nr

nt

nt

39(18.1)

[32]

AA

1975-1980

165

22(13.3)

0(0)

19(11.5)

nt

nt

23(13.9)

[33]a

AA

1982-1983

45

12(26.7)

0(0)

8(17.8)

nt

nt

10(22.2)

[34]b

AA

1992-1993

37

30(81.1)

28(75.7)

31(83.8)

nt

nt

30(81.1)

[35]

AA

1993-1996

110

40(36.4)

57(51.8)

39(35.5)

nt

nt

41(37.3)

[36]b

AA

1995

45

31(68.9)

26(57.8)

21(46.7)

nt

nt

26(57.8)

[37]

JM

2000

59

35(59.3)

24(40.7)

21(35.6)

nt

nt

45(76.3)

[38]b

GD

2003-2005

59

54(91.5)

38(64.4)

46(78.0)

nt

6(10.2)

46(78)

[13]b

AA/JM

2004-2006

113

93(82.3)

91(80.5)

92(81.4)

89(78.8)

1(0.9)

91(80.5)

[39]

BD

2003-2008

84

77(91.7)

67(79.8)

37(44.1)

nt

nt

72(85.7)

[40]c

HR

2007

28

28(100)

nt

18(64.3)

nt

nt

20(71.4)

[41]d,e

DM

2007-2009

8

8(100)

8(100)

8(100)

8 (100)

0(0)

8(100)

[14]d,e,

EU/USA

2003-2007

35

34(97.1)

35(100)

35(100)

34(97.1)

0(0)

35(100)

[15]d,e

BL

2006-2009

26

26 (100)

26(100)

26(100)

26(100)

0(0)

26(100)

  1. AA = Addis Ababa; AA/JM = Addis Ababa and Jimma; Amp = ampicillin; BD = Bahirdar; BL = Belgium; Chl = chloramphenicol; Cip = ciprofloxacin; Cro = ceftriaxone; DM = Denmark; ET = Ethiopia; EU/USA = Europe and the United States of America; HR = Harar; JM = Jimma; GD = Gondar; n = number of isolates; nr = not reported; nt = not tested; Sxt = co-trimoxazole; Ys = Year of study.
  2. aThe numbers of chloramphenicol and ampicillin resistant isolates were derived from the proportions of sensitive isolates.
  3. bThe third highest mono-drug resistant isolates number was considered as the number of MDR isolates assuming that the prevalence of MDR isolates is mainly a reflection of the highly resisted drugs.
  4. cData on amoxicillin was substituted to ampicillin assuming that the mechanism of resistance could be similar.
  5. dThe data show the proportions of drug resistant S. Concord.
  6. eThe exact origin of the adoptees was not reported.