Skip to main content

Table 6 Susceptibility pattern of Enterobacteriaceae to ceftazidime and cefotaxime

From: Phenotypic expression and prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in samples collected from patients in various wards of Mulago Hospital, Uganda

 

Ceftazidime (%)

Cefotaxime (%)

 

Resistant

Intermediate

Susceptible

Resistant

Intermediate

Susceptible

E. coli

41 (66.1)

7 (11.3)

14 (22.6)

32 (51.6)

9 (14.5)

21 (33.9)

E. cloacae

4 (100)

0 (0)

0 (0)

3 (75)

0 (0)

1 (25)

K. pneumoniae

27 (81.8)

1 (3)

5 (15.2)

21 (63.6)

3 (9.1)

9 (27.3)

Proteus mirabilis

12 (75)

3 (18.8)

1 (6.3)

10 (62.5)

1 (6.3)

5 (31.2)

%

73.0

9.6

17.4

57.5

11.3

31.3

  1. There was a higher percentage of Enterobacteriaceae isolates showing resistance to ceftazidime than to cefotaxime. The interpretative criteria used was based on CLSI M100-S20 (2010) [11] where for ceftazidime (Resistant ≤17 mm; Intermediate 18-20 mm; Susceptible ≥ 21 mm) and for cefotaxime (Resistant ≤22 mm; Intermediate 23-25 mm; Susceptible ≥ 26 mm)