Skip to main content

Table 4 Hazard ratios and 95 % CI of prescription stimulant medication in Aboriginal children and adolescents

From: Use of prescription stimulant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Aboriginal children and adolescents: a linked data cohort study

Parameter

Univariate Analysis

Multivariate Analysisa

HR (95 % CI)

P-Value

HR (95 % CI)

P-Value

Mothers’ age group in years at birth

<20

0.70(0.47–10.4)

0.08

0.69(0.45–1.07)

0.10

20–24

1.10(0.80–1.50)

0.56

1.20(0.85–1.69)

0.29

25–29

1.0

 

1.0

 

30–34

1.06(0.72–1.57)

0.78

1.30(0.86–1.96)

0.22

35–39

0.98(0.54–1.77)

0.94

1.25(0.68–2.28)

0.48

≥40

0.46(0.06–3.33)

0.44

0.60(0.08–4.33)

0.61

Sex

Female

1.0

 

1.0

 

Male

4.51(3.27–6.23)

<0.001

4.08(2.92–5.69)

<0.001

Geographical remoteness

Metropolitan

1.0

 

1.0

 

Rural

0.83(0.61–1.13)

0.23

0.82(0.60–1.12)

0.20

Remote

0.39(0.27–0.58)

<0.001

0.38(0.26–0.56)

<0.001

Socioeconomic disadvantage

Least disadvantaged

1.0

 

1.0

 

Less disadvantaged

1.05(0.68–1.63)

0.82

1.15(0.74–1.78)

0.53

Little disadvantaged

1.25(0.78–1.99)

0.35

1.29(0.81–2.05)

0.29

More disadvantaged

1.10(0.65–1.88)

0.71

1.26(0.74–2.16)

0.39

Most disadvantaged

1.14(0.76–1.72)

0.53

1.40(0.92–2.12)

0.12

  1. aAll parameters were included in the regression model so as to adjust each result for potential confounding by all other covariates