Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Eggertsen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Eggertsen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Tershakovec |
| 23 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angel-Luis García-Otín |
| 20 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Eggertsen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angel-Luis García-Otín |
| 26 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Tershakovec |
| 3 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Eggertsen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/2050-6511-13-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.