Relation studied | Study. year | Scale | Peripherical adverse effect | Patient’s groups compared when looking for a correlation | Association | Association magnitude |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anticholinergic drug use and peripheral effects | Thomson WM. 1993 | No Scale | Xerostomia | Occurrence of reported dry mouth in patients taking anticholinergics drugs vs patient not taken | + | 50% vs 19% (p = 0.02) b |
Katz IR. 1988 | No Scale | Xerostomia | Dry mouth reported by patients that taking anticholinergics drugs (PNS + CNS) vs patients not taking anticholinergic drugs | + | 69% vs 29% (p < 0.05) c | |
Xerostomia | Dry mouth reported by patients that taking anticholinergics drugs (CNS) vs patients not taking anticholinergic drugs | + | 64% vs 29% (p < 0.05) c | |||
Ness J. 2006 | No Scale | Xerostomia | Used at least 1 anticholinergic agent vs did not use any anticholinergic | + | −0.7((−1.1)-0.3) (p < 0.01)d | |
Xerophthalmia | – | −0.2 ((−0.3)-(−0.1) (p = 0.39)d | ||||
Desoutter A. 2011 | No Scale | Xerostomia | Patients with anticholinergics drug use vs patients without anticholinergic drugs | + | 1.35 (1.05–1.73) (p = 0.02)e | |
Anticholinergic burden and peripheral effects | Rudolph JL. 2008 | ARS | Peripheral adverse eventsa | Retrospective cohort: ARS = 0, ARS = 1–2 vs ARS ≥ 3 | + | 1.4 (1.0–1.9)f |
Prospective cohort ARS = 0,ARS = 1–2 vs ARS ≥ 3 | + | 2.1 (1.5–2.9)f | ||||
Kersten H. 2012 | ADS | Xerostomia | ADS = 3 vs ADS = 4 | – | 0.0 (−0.3-(0.3))g | |
ADS = 3 vs ADS = 5 | – | − 0.1 (− 0.3-(0.2))g | ||||
ADS = 3 vs ADS≥6 | + | −0.4 (− 0.7-(0.1)) (p < 0.001)g | ||||
Kersten H. 2013 | ADS | Xerostomia | Intervention group vs control group | – | −0.07 (− 0.21–0.07) (p = 0.34)h | |
Tiisanoja A. 2017 | ADS | Salivary estimulated secretion | ADS = 0 vs ADS≥3 | – | 1.50 (0.80–2.81) i | |
Salivary unestimulated secretion | ADS = 0 vs ADS≥3 | + | 2.31 (1.22–4.43)i | |||
Xerostomia | ADS = 0 vs ADS≥3 | + | 3.17 (1.44–6.96)i | |||
Inkeri NM. 2019 | ARS | Xerophthalmia | ARS = 0 vs ARS > 0 | – | No numerical data available | |
Diabetic patients with ARS = 0 vs diabetic patients with ARS > 0 | – | |||||
Xerostomia | ARS = 0 vs ARS > 0 | – | No numerical data available | |||
Diabetic patients with ARS = 0 vs diabetic patients with ARS > 0 | – | |||||
Lavrador M. 2021 | ARS | Xerophthalmia | Differences between the median of anticholinergic burden scale scores in patients with xerostomia or xeropthalmia vs the median of anticholinergic burden scale scores in patients without xerostomia or xeropthalmia | + | 1.0 vs 0.0 (p = 0.001)j | |
Xerostomia | + | 1.0 vs 0.0 (p < 0.001)j | ||||
ADS | Xerophthalmia | + | 2.0 vs 2.0 (p = 0.020)j | |||
Xerostomia | + | 2.0 vs 1.5 (p < 0.001)j | ||||
ACB | Xerophthalmia | + | 3.0 vs 1.0 (p < 0.001)j | |||
Xerostomia | + | 2.0 vs 1.0 (p < 0.001)j | ||||
DBI | Xerophthalmia | + | 0.96 vs 0.50 (p < 0.001)j | |||
Xerostomia | + | 0.75 vs 0.13 (p < 0.001)j |