Favorable response to pembrolizumab after durvalumab failure in a stage III sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: a case report
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology volume 21, Article number: 26 (2020)
Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype with a poor prognosis. In the phase III PACIFIC study, durvalumab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus placebo, in patients with stage III NSCLC who do not have disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, treatments for patients who discontinue durvalumab due to disease progression, are unknown.
We report a case of favorable response to pembrolizumab in a patient with disease progression during durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy for stage III pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2 expression.
Here, we present what, to the best of our knowledge, is the first reported case in which durvarumab resistance after definitive chemoradiotherapy in a patient with stage III pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma was overcome by pembrolizumab.
Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) is a rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for approximately 0.1 to 0.4% of all lung cancer cases . SC is a general term that includes pleomorphic carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, giant cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and pulmonary blastoma . SC shows highly aggressive biological behaviors associated with a poor prognosis and high resistance to chemotherapy [3, 4]. SC shows high levels of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) [5, 6], and it has recently been reported that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are very effective. Most ICIs are PD-1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab . In the phase III PACIFIC study, durvalumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo, in patients with stage III without disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy [8, 9]. Following discontinuation of durvalumab, 195 patients (41.0%) received subsequent anticancer therapy. Most patients subsequently received cytotoxic chemotherapy, and only 38 patients (8.0%) received additional immunotherapy . No results have been reported for the subsequent treatment. We herein report the use of pembrolizumab in the setting of disease progression during durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in a patient with stage III SC with high PD-L1 expression.
A 62-year-old healthy asymptomatic male current-smoker presented with an abnormal shadow on chest radiography during a regular health check-up. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass in the right upper lobe. Transbronchial lung biopsy pathology confirmed SC. The lung biopsy specimens were negative for p40, thyroid transcription factor 1, and calretinin, and positive for cytokeratin AE1/3. The patient was diagnosed with stage IIIA (cT3N1M0) SC in May 2018. Molecular testing revealed no targetable mutations. Immunohistochemical staining of the tumor tissue showed PD-L1 expression in 90% of the tumor. The patient was treated with two cycles of concurrent vinorelbine (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin (`5 mg/m2 on day 1) and definitive 60 Gy of thoracic radiation therapy. He showed a partial response to treatment at the primary tumor site and received durvalumab at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Three months later, in November 2018, disease progression was detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, which showed new metastases in the left lung, abdominal lymph nodes, and left psoas. He had undergone seven cycles of durvalumab. He immediately received pembrolizumab at 200 mg/body every 3 weeks, because of the high expression of PD-L1 in the tumors. After two cycles of pembrolizumab, CT revealed a durable clinical response in December 2018. The patient has subsequently achieved complete tumor response in June 2019 (Fig. 1).
Discussion and conclusions
The case presented herein adds valuable insights into the use of pembrolizumab in the setting of disease progression during durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in a patient with stage III SC with high PD-L1 expression.
The primary site in the right lung was reduced markedly, but three new metastatic lesions appeared during durvalumab treatment (Fig. 1). This case was clearly considered a progressive disease. The results of PACIFIC phase III trial are expected to establish durvalumab, a selective PD-L1 inhibitor, as the standard consolidation strategy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC without disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy [8, 9]. Exploratory post-hoc analyzes showed that the benefits of PFS and OS in the durvalumab group were evident in patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 25% or greater before chemoradiation. PD-L1 expression of ≥25% on tumor cells occurred in 24.2% of patients in the durvalumab group, but the proportion of PD-L1 expression in ≥50% of tumor cells is unknown. Currently, as a result of the KEYNOTE-024 trial results, pembrolizumab, a selective PD-1 inhibitor, is administered as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression on ≥50% of tumor cells . One of the reasons that the efficacy of pembrolizumab is improved compared to durvalumab is the essential difference between anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1. Duan J. et al. performed meta-analysis and suggests that anti–PD-1 exhibited favorable survival outcomes and a safety profile comparable to that of anti–PD-L1 . Pembrolizumab binds PD-1 and blocks the PD-1–PD-L1/PD-L2 axis. In contrast, durvalumab selectively blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80 without inhibiting PD-L2. Therefore, the interaction of PD-1 and PD-L2 remain intact and may inhibit T cell activation. In a recent report of patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies, both PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity potentially predicted clinical response to anti-PD-1 therapy .
In the PACIFIC trial, 52.9% of the patients in the durvalumab group had a nonsquamous histologic type of tumor, but no cases of SC were reported. SC shows highly aggressive behavior and resistance to chemotherapy [3, 4]. Recent studies report that SC shows high levels of PD-L1 , tumor mutation burden and strong immune-cell infiltration . We suspected pleomorphic carcinoma in this case because of the histologic components of spindle and giant cells, although there was limited biopsy tissue. Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinomas very frequently express both PD-L1 and PD-L2 . This case had high PD-L1/PD-L2 expression on tumor cells (Fig. 2). Therefore, targeting the PD-1–PD-L1/PD-L2 pathway may represent a potential therapeutic candidate for this type of aggressive tumor after failure of durvalumab. In conclusion, pembrolizumab may be an option for treatment to durvalumab resistance after definitive chemoradiotherapy in a patient with stage III SC with high PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Of course, this case is only one case, so we cannot assert it and more cases are needed.
Availability of data and materials
All data are contained within the manuscript.
Non-small-cell lung cancer
Programmed cell death ligand 1
Programmed cell death ligand 2
Yendamuri S, Caty L, Pine M, Adem S, Bogner P, Miller A, et al. Outcomes of sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis. Surgery. 2012;152(3):397–402.
Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(9):1243–60.
Vieira T, Girard N, Ung M, Monnet I, Cazes A, Bonnette P, et al. Efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung sarcomatoid carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(12):1574–7.
Ung M, Rouquette I, Filleron T, Taillandy K, Brouchet L, Bennouna J, et al. Characteristics and clinical outcomes of Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17(5):391–7.
Velcheti V, Rimm DL, Schalper KA. Sarcomatoid lung carcinomas show high levels of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(6):803–5.
Vieira T, Antoine M, Hamard C, Fallet V, Duruisseaux M, Rabbe N, et al. Sarcomatoid lung carcinomas show high levels of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and strong immune-cell infiltration by TCD3 cells and macrophages. Lung Cancer. 2016;98:51–8.
Domblides C, Leroy K, Monnet I, Mazieres J, Barlesi F, Gounant V, et al. Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung Sarcomatoid carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2020. [Epub ahead of print].
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, et al. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1919–29.
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, et al. Overall survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2342–50.
Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csoszi T, Fulop A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823–33.
Duan J, Cui L, Zhao X, Bai H, Cai S, Wang G, et al. Use of immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 vs programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors in patients with Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019;26. [Epub ahead of print].
Takamori S, Takada K, Toyokawa G, Azuma K, Shimokawa M, Jogo T, et al. PD-L2 expression as a potential predictive biomarker for the response to anti-PD-1 drugs in patients with non-small cell lung Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(10):5897–901.
Kim S, Kim MY, Koh J, Go H, Lee DS, Jeon YK, et al. Programmed death-1 ligand 1 and 2 are highly expressed in pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung: comparison of sarcomatous and carcinomatous areas. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(17):2698–707.
We particularly thank the patient for consenting to share the details of this case.
No funding sources to report.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
According to Norwegian regulations no ethics approval was required for this case report.
Consent for publication
Written and verbal consent from the patient has been obtained. As stated in the instructions, a consent form has not been included on submission but is available for request.
KN received honoraria from AstraZeneca and MSD. KK received honoraria from AstraZeneca. TI received honoraria from AstraZeneca and MSD. MT received honoraria from AstraZeneca and MSD. TK received from AstraZeneca and MSD. All the others declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Nishino, K., Kunimasa, K., Kimura, M. et al. Favorable response to pembrolizumab after durvalumab failure in a stage III sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: a case report. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 21, 26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-020-00404-7