Drugs and gut microbiome interactions—an emerging field of tailored medicine
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology volume 24, Article number: 43 (2023)
Gut dwelling microbes provide profound biochemical advantages to the host, including nutrient and drug absorption, metabolism, and excretion. It is an emerging understanding that drug-response bias (particularly for orally intake medicine) is related to variation in the microbial composition in the gut. This Editorial at BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology introduces our collection which is discussing the role of gut microbes in modulating drugs’ efficacy and bioavailability.
Humans have co-evolved with microbes that constitute about 43% of the human body by cell count. Any dysbiosis in the microbial composition could put the host at risks of developing diseases like obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer [1,2,3,4]. These microbes inhabit the exterior and interior surfaces of the body. Among the body parts, gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is the most densely populated by microbes, known as gut microbiota (GM), which provides significant biochemical advantages to the host in nutrient and drug absorption, metabolism, and excretion.
GM influences a wide range of body’s function. Variation in the GM diversity and composition result in a profound impact on host’s metabolism, immunity, and response to orally consumed drug. It is an established fact that intra-individual variability in the composition of GM contributes to drug response biases for certain therapeutics. One might have noticed why some drugs are more efficient in some individuals than others. It has been speculated that these drug biases might be due to the variations in the GM diversity and composition of the patient. As drugs pass through the GIT and come into contact with numerous microbial enzymes, they undergo extensive structural modification that consequently affect their function. There are several mechanisms through which GM could remodel drugs’ efficacy and bioavailability.
GM improve drugs’ efficacy through immune system
One such example is the anti-PD-L1 antibodies (a treatment for cancer) treatment, which is dependent upon the composition of gut microbiota. It is observed that anti-PD-L1 (an antibody that blocks CTLA-4) efficacy improves in the presence of Bifidobacterium. Oral administration of anti-PD-1 and Bifidobacterium has been observed with augmented dendritic cell function and improved CD8+ T cell priming in the tumor microenvironment . Besides, anti-CTLA-4 therapies have also shown dependence on the presence of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron or Bacteroides fragilis. In another study, it was noticed that melanoma patients harboring more Ruminococcaceae responded effectively toward anti-CTLA-4 treatments .
Another such an example is cyclophosphamide, an anti-cancer immune-suppressant chemo-therapeutic, which efficacy is dependent on Barnesiella intestinihominis and Enterococcus hirae (gut commensals) that contribute to the translocation of lymphoid organ and mimic the production of pathogenic T helper 17 cells and memory Th1 immune responses . During cyclophosphamide therapy, Barnesiella intestinihominis accumulates in the colon and infiltrates γδT cells in the cancer lesion. Whereas Enterococcus hirae translocates to secondary lymphoid organs and stimulates intratumoral CD8/Treg ratio . Microbial influences on the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs, 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine, and 5-fluorouracil have also been reported .
GM affect drug’s efficacy through biotransformation
In addition to the mechanisms discussed above, GM could also remodel drug’s efficacy through biotransformation . For instance, Egertella species (gut-dwelling bacteria) reduce digoxin (a cardenolide for treating heart failure) to an active metabolite (called dihydrodioxin) through an enzyme called Cgr2 . Similarly, levamisole (a drug use for treating colon cancer) is transformed into levametabol-I, II and III by gut bacteria . Therefore, it is important to evaluate the function of GM-generated metabolites. In some cases, GM encoded enzymes could remodel the structure of a drug in a way that causes severe side effects. For example, CPT-11 is colon cancer chemotherapeutic which is transformed by the β-glucuronidases of the gut commensal and can cause severe diarrhea. To tackle these unwanted outcomes, designing targeted inhibitors with the aim of blocking the enzymes rather than eradicating gut commensals is essential. Study looking into this has previously been done by Wallace et al. where they developed bacterial β-glucuronidase inhibitors that had no effect on the orthologous mammalian enzyme .
GM affect drug’s availability through bioaccumulation
In process of bioaccumulation, bacteria accumulate drug intracellularly without changing its structure or growth. Thus, restricting the drug availability to the host. For instance, the bioavailability of antidepressant drug duloxetine and the antidiabetic drug rosiglitazone is significantly affected by Enterococcus sp., Lactobacillus sp., and Bifidobacterium sp. through the process of bioaccumulation . Another study has reported the bioaccumulation of simvastatin in an in vitro setting .
In conclusion, GM is emerging as a new player in personalized medicine, and various methods are being developed to treat diseases by remodeling of patients’ GM composition. However, it is emphasized that microbiome-based therapies should be tailored to disease types and body sites. For example, men with metastatic prostate tumors who responded to checkpoint inhibition have been found to have lower levels of Akkermansia muciniphila in their stool than men who did not respond. But the opposite is true for people with lung and kidney cancers — those with more A. muciniphila in their guts tended to fare better on the therapy . This collection on Drugs and gut microbiome interactions, launched in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology aims to highlight new interaction of drug-GM, and how these interactions can improve drug efficacy and bioavailability. We also welcome studies that investigate gut bacteria that that are responsible for in activation of drugs.
Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(8).
Maeda Y, Takeda K. Role of Gut Microbiota in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Med. 2017;6(6):60.
Stefka AT, Feehley T, Tripathi P, Qiu J, McCoy K, Mazmanian SK, et al. Commensal bacteria protect against food allergen sensitization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(36):13145–50.
Sun J, Kato I. Gut microbiota, inflammation and colorectal cancer. Vol. 3, Genes and Diseases. 2016. p. 130–43.
Sivan A, Corrales L, Hubert N, Williams JB, Aquino-Michaels K, Earley ZM, et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Sci (80). 2015;350(6264):1084–9.
Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Karpinets TV, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Sci (80). 2017;359(6371):97–103.
Viaud S, Saccheri F, Mignot G, Yamazaki T, Daillere R, Hannani D, et al. The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide. Science. 2013;342(6161):971–6.
Daillère R, Vétizou M, Waldschmitt N, Yamazaki T, Isnard C, Poirier-Colame V et al. Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects. Immunity. 2016.
García-González AP, Ritter AD, Shrestha S, Andersen EC, Yilmaz LS, Walhout AJM. Bacterial metabolism affects the C. elegans response to Cancer Chemotherapeutics. Cell. 2017;169(3):431–441e8.
Klünemann M, Andrejev S, Blasche S, Mateus A, Phapale P, Devendran S, et al. Bioaccumulation of therapeutic drugs by human gut bacteria. Nature. 2021;597(7877):533–8.
Koppel N, Maini Rekdal V, Balskus EP. Chemical transformation of xenobiotics by the human gut microbiota. Sci (80). 2017;356(6344):eaag2770.
Shu YZ, Kingston DG, Van Tassell RL, Wilkins TD. Metabolism of levamisole, an anti-colon cancer drug, by human intestinal bacteria. Xenobiotica. 1991;21(6):737–50.
Wallace BD, Wang H, Lane KT, Scott JE, Orans J, Koo JS, et al. Alleviating cancer drug toxicity by inhibiting a bacterial enzyme. Sci (80-). 2010;330(6005):831–5.
Đanić M, Pavlović N, Lazarević S, Stanimirov B, Vukmirović S, Al-Salami H, et al. Bioaccumulation and biotransformation of simvastatin in probiotic bacteria: a step towards better understanding of drug-bile acids-microbiome interactions. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1111115.
Dolgin E. Fighting cancer with microbes. Vol. 577, Nature. England; 2020. p. S16–8.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, I. Drugs and gut microbiome interactions—an emerging field of tailored medicine. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 24, 43 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-023-00684-9