Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Potentiating effect of imidacloprid on arsenic-induced testicular toxicity in Wistar rats

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology201819:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-018-0239-9

  • Received: 20 October 2017
  • Accepted: 20 July 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

It is an established fact that humans and animals are exposed to more than one chemical concurrently from various sources such as food, air and water. In the past, much emphasis was laid on evaluating the toxic effects of a single chemical. Nowadays an increased attention is being paid to the interaction of xenobiotics with one another. Therefore, a study was aimed to evaluate the potentiating effect of imidacloprid (IMI) on arsenic-induced testicular toxicity in rats.

Methods

Adult male Wistar rats randomly divided into eight groups with six in each were subjected to daily oral administrations for 28 days. Group I served as control, group II received IMI at the dose rate of 16.9 mg/kg body weight, group III, IV and V received arsenic at the dose rate of 50, 100 and 150 ppb in drinking water whereas group VI, VII and VIII received both arsenic and IMI.

Results

Repeated oral administrations of IMI or arsenic (150 ppb) alone resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) elevation in the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and advanced oxidation protein product (AOPP) along with significant (P < 0.05) decline in total thiols and antioxidant enzymatic activities indicating reduced antioxidant defense in testicular tissue of exposed rats. These findings were further corroborated with histological alterations in testes like fluid accumulation in interstitial spaces in IMI administered rats. Similarly, rats provided access exclusively to arsenic-containing drinking water induced degenerative changes in seminiferous tubules in a concentration-dependent manner. Concurrent administration of IMI and arsenic produced more severe antioxidant and histopathological alterations of testes as compared to exposure to either toxicant.

Conclusions

Reduced antioxidant activities, increased MDA and AOPP levels with severe histopathological alterations in testes of rats on concurrent exposure indicated that IMI potentiated the arsenic-induced testicular toxicity in Wistar rats.

Keywords

  • Imidacloprid
  • Arsenic
  • Testes
  • Antioxidant
  • Oxidative damage

Background

The ability of the chemical pollutants to affect reproductive health has garnered significant attention in recent decades and is further compounded by the endocrine disruptive chemicals in the environment [13]. Chemicals that disrupt normal endocrine functions may interfere with the hormonal pathways responsible for the control of reproduction [4] triggering morphological and functional abnormalities in reproductive organs. Testicular toxicity of insecticides and other toxicants result in male infertility in mammals [5].

Various experimental studies have shown cellular and molecular aspects of gonadal damage in animals during spermatogenesis following chemical exposure including insecticides [5, 6]. Imidacloprid (IMI), a newer neonicotinoid has gained wide acceptance as an insecticide due to its extremely high insecticidal potency, broad insecticidal spectra, excellent systemic properties in pests and a low mammalian toxicity [7]. Agrochemicals along with heavy metals from emissions and groundwater are the main sources responsible for the environmental contamination [8]. Among heavy metals, Arsenic (As) is categorized as a ubiquitous trace element and is the 52nd most abundant element in the earth’s crust. Arsenic finds a place in the priority list of hazardous substances published by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [9]. Studies revealed that arsenic interacts with sperm DNA which may contribute to the mechanisms for a trans-generational reproductive effect [9, 10].

The concurrent exposure of more than one environmental toxicant in mammals induce depletion in antioxidant defence system as indicated with reduced levels of total thiols (TTH) including reduced glutathione (GSH). Antioxidant defence system scavenges reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) generated in tissues and sub-cellular compartments during intoxication [11]. It has been reported that excessive generation of these free radicals in testicular tissue reduces antioxidant defence resulting in the disruption of the functional integrity of membrane structures of mitochondria and other cytoplasmic organelles through peroxidation of phospholipids, proteins and nucleotides [12, 13]. Hence, ROS plays an important role in the pathogenesis of male reproductive system due to the existence of high polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) in the testes which makes it more sensitive to oxidative insults [14, 15]. Therefore, the present study was aimed to evaluate the potentiating effect of imidacloprid (IMI) on arsenic-induced testicular toxicity in male Wistar rats.

Methods

Experimental animals and chemicals used

The study was conducted on adult male Wistar rats (180–200 g, 12-14 weeks of age) procured from Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (IIIM), Jammu. The animals were provided standard pelleted ration and tap water for drinking ad-libitum. All animals were maintained under standard managemental conditions (22 ± 3 °C, 50–60% relative humidity and 12 h light-dark cycles). Prior to the start of the experiment, Wistar rats were acclimatized in the laboratory conditions for a period of 15 days. All the experimental animals were kept under constant observation during the entire period of study. The experimental protocol was dully approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) vide letter no AU/ANN/13–14/IAEC/143–54, dated 24/05/2013. Imidacloprid (17.8% SL) used in the present study was commercially obtained from Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Agribusiness, Mumbai, India. Analytical grade Sodium Arsenate (Product no. 20237) procured from S.D. Fine-Chem. Limited, Mumbai was used as a source of arsenic. All other chemicals used in the study were of analytical grade and purchased from different standard firms.

Experimental protocol

The low observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) dose (16.9 mg/kg) of imidacloprid was used in the study to determine its effects alone and in conjunction with the different doses of arsenic in drinking water. As per the WHO guidelines, the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of arsenic in drinking water is 50 ppb [16] and in the present study, three dose levels viz. 50, 100 and 150 ppb in drinking water were used in the study [4.165 mg of Sodium arsenate used provided 1 mg arsenic].

Adult male Wistar rats were randomly allocated into eight groups with six rats each. Group I received distilled water (1 ml/day) and served as the control, whereas group II received IMI orally at the dose rate of 16.9 mg/kg body weight. Group III, IV and V were provided access exclusively to drinking water containing arsenic at the rate of 50, 100 and 150 ppb, respectively. The groups VI, VII and VIII received combined administration of IMI and arsenic at the dose rate of 16.9 mg/kg + 50 ppb, 16.9 mg/kg + 100 ppb and 16.9 mg/kg + 150 ppb, respectively. The animals received daily dosing of IMI between 9.00–10.00 AM daily for a period of 28 days. All animals were weighed weekly for modifying the total dose of IMI to be administered. The animals were observed for clinical signs if any, during the entire period of study.

Collection and processing of samples

After the end of 28 days of daily administrations of toxicants animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and testes 1 g each was collected in 10 ml ice-cold 0.5 M Phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and formal saline (10%) for antioxidant parameters and histopathological studies, respectively. Tissue homogenate (10%) was prepared by homogenizing the testicular tissue using Teflon coated homogenizer at 1000 rpm for 5–7 min at 4 °C.

Determination of lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation product in testes

Levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and advanced oxidation protein product (AOPP) were determined in the testicular tissue to determine the intensity of oxidation of membrane lipids and cellular proteins, respectively the following exposure to toxicant alone and in combination [17, 18].

Determination of antioxidant parameters in testes

Total thiols (TTH) level was determined in testes as per the standard method using reduced glutathione and was expressed in mM [19]. Various antioxidant enzymes in testicular tissue viz., catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione-s-transferase (GST) were determined spectrophotometrically (UV-1601, Shimadzu) to assess the alterations in antioxidant system following exposure to toxicant alone or in combination [2024].

Histopathological studies

The histopathological studies were carried out according to standard methods. Formalin-fixed testes of the different group were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a light microscope for histopathological studies.

Statistical analysis

The biochemical and oxidative stress parameters were analyzed for analysis of variance at 5% level of significance using the Duncan Multiple Range test (SPSS 16.0).

Results

Antioxidant biomarkers in testicular tissue following repeated oral administration of IMI and arsenic alone and in combination in rats is presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Activities of various antioxidant enzymes and total thiols (TTH) level in testes of Wistar rats following repeated oral administrations of IMI and arsenic alone and in combination

Groups

TTH

GST

GR

GPx

SOD

CAT

I. Control

4.76c ± 0.540

59.03f ± 3.34

25.56f ± 1.88

26.89e ± 2.99

196.80d ± 13.12

1694.41e ± 62.69

II. Imidacloprid (IMI) (16.9 mg/kg)

3.26ab ± 0.105

38.65d ± 2.83

15.72bcd ± 1.73

17.26cd ± 1.30

136.44bc ± 14.02

1152.61d ± 42.63

III. Arsenic (50 ppb)

3.96bc ± 0.151

50.65e ± 3.64

21.58ef ± 1.44

19.68d ± 1.19

160.96cd ± 15.02

1256.72d ± 58.52

IV. Arsenic (100 ppb)

3.52ab ± 0.302

41.48d ± 1.90

19.30de ± 1.50

16.24cd ± 1.24

146.71bc ± 13.59

1189.93d ± 51.57

V. Arsenic (150 ppb)

3.23ab ± 0.341

30.50c ± 1.83

16.51cd ± 1.33

13.65bc ± 0.923

135.89bc ± 14.95

1020.15c ± 32.86

VI. IMI + As (50 ppb)

2.88ab ± 0.229

24.28bc ± 1.73

13.75bc ± 1.42

10.02ab ± 0.806

128.90bc ± 12.97

744.78b ± 36.45

VII. IMI + As (100 ppb)

2.75a ± 0.425

20.65ab ± 1.30

11.59ab ± 1.09

8.75a ± 0.899

117.26ab ± 12.86

687.69b ± 33.43

VIII. IMI + As (150 ppb)

2.40a ± 0.457

14.60a ± 0.350

8.50a ± 0.967

6.01a ± 0.753

84.25a ± 9.90

544.78a ± 34.73

Values are given as mean ± SE of 6 animals unless otherwise stated

Values having different superscript (a,b,c,d,e,f) in a column are statistically different from one another at 5% level of significance

Values of TTH (total thiols) are expressed in μM

Values of GST (glutathione S transferase) are expressed in μmol of CDNB conjugate formed/ min/ g of tissue

Values of GR (glutathione reductase) are expressed nmol of NADPH/min

Values of GPx (glutathione peroxidase) are expressed in Unit/ g of tissue

Values of SOD (Superoxide dismutase) are expressed in Unit/ g of tissue

Values of CAT (Catalase) are expressed in μmol H2O2 decomposed/ min/ g of tissue

Glutathione-S-transferase (GST)

A significant (P < 0.05) decrease in GST activity was observed (34.5%) after repeated IMI administrations for 28 days considering the activity of the control group as 100%. Similarly, there was significant (P < 0.05) fall in GST activity within group III (14.2%), IV (29.7%) and V (48.3%) compared to the control. Similar significant (P < 0.05) decrease in the activities of GST were observed in group VI (58.9%), VII (65.0%) and VIII (75.3%).

Glutathione reductase (GR)

Significant (P < 0.05) decrease in GR activity was observed in IMI exposed animals (38.5%), as well as in groups III (15.6%), IV (24.5%) and V (35.4%) compared to control group. Such a significant fall in GR activity is also seen in combined exposed groups VI, VII and VIII (46.2–65.6%) as compared to the control group.

Glutathione peroxidase (GPX)

GPx activity of testicular tissue had significantly (P < 0.05) declined in group II (35.8%), III (26.8%), IV(39.6%) and V (49.2%) as compared to following repeated oral exposure of toxicants. Similarly, GPx activity was profoundly declined in concurrent exposed groups (62.7–77.6%) compared to the control group.

Catalase (CAT)

CAT activity testes had significantly (P < 0.05) declined in all groups exposed to toxicants either alone (IMI or Arsenic) or in combination (IMI with arsenic) as to compared control group. The decline in CAT activity was observed to be concentration dependent with arsenic (25.8–39.8%). Such decline was more profound (56.0–67.8%) in combined exposed groups.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD)

A significant (P < 0.05) fall in SOD activity was observed in group II (30.7%), III (18.2%), IV (25.5%) and V (30.9%) as compared to control group. A similar decline in the activity of SOD was observed in different combined administered groups (34.5–57.2%).

Total thiols (TTH)

A significant (P < 0.05) decrease in mean TTH level was observed in IMI or arsenic alone administered groups - II (31.5%), III (16.8%), IV (26.1%) and V (32.1%) in comparison to control group. However decrease in TTH level a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in TTH level was observed in Group VI (39.5%), VII (42.2%) and VIII (49.6%) compared to control group.

Testicular damage indicators

MDA and AOPP levels in testes of different groups of animals exposed IMI or arsenic alone and in combination are shown in Fig. 1a and b respectively.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Effect of repeated oral administrations of IMI and arsenic alone and in combination on (a) MDA and (b) AOPP levels in testes of Wistar rats. (Mean values having different superscripts (a, b, c) are statistically different from one another at 5% level of significance)

Significant (P < 0.05) increase in lipid peroxidation (MDA levels) were observed in group II (120.4%), III (62.0%), IV (102.5%) and V (151%) after repeated administration of IMI or arsenic for 28 days. However such rise was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in combined administered groups viz. VI (206.3%), VII (251.4%) and VIII (278.4%) compared to the control group.

A significant (P < 0.05) increase in protein oxidation (AOPP) levels was observed in IMI exposed group (37.4%) as compared to the control group. Arsenic in different used concentrations was less effective in increasing the AOPP levels (15.6–23.8%). However, increased AOPP levels were higher in co-exposed groups (43.5–53.1%).

Histopathological alterations

The histopathological alterations in the testes following repeated oral administrations of IMI and arsenic alone or in combination in Wistar rats are shown in Fig. 2. In normal rats, histologically the testes had normal morphological features comprising of seminiferous tubules with central tubular lumen surrounded by a basement membrane and no microscopic lesion of pathological significance was observed. All stages of spermatogenesis could be appreciably seen and mature spermatozoa, interstitial tissue contained Leydig cells, macrophages were present in the lumen of control animal testes. In IMI exposed group, the testicular parenchyma did not show any significant histological alterations when compared to control, other than mild edematous fluid accumulation in the interstitial spaces. Testes in rats belonging to group III had appreciable but only mild degenerative changes in few seminiferous tubules. In rats belonging to group V appreciable degenerative and necrotic changes of germ cells were observed and such changes were not seen in rats administered lower concentration of arsenic.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Photomicrograph of H & E (10X) stained sections of formalin fixed testes (a) Control: normal testicular parenchyma with seminiferous tubules and interstitial tissue (b) IMI administered group: mild edema in the interstitial spaces (c) Arsenic group: mild degeneration and necrosis in germ cells (d) group VI disruption of seminiferous tubules and necrosis of germ cells (e) Group VII: Severely necrotic seminiferous tubules and (f) Group VIII: fibrillar debris representing the remnants of seminiferous tubules of testes in Wistar rats

In co-exposed rats (group VI) severe degenerative changes in seminiferous tubules with their number reduced along with degeneration and depletion of germ cells of all the lineages was observed. Increased concentrations of arsenic in drinking water and IMI induced more severe histopathological changes in the testes. Severe testicular necrosis was seen in group VII characterized by tubular shrinkage, decreased lumen diameter along with generalized necrosis and depletion of germ cells. More severe changes were appreciable in group VIII where tubules became severely necrotic with only remnants of fibrillar necrotic debris seen in testicular sections.

Discussion

Arsenic endemic areas groundwater is the major source of intoxication to mammals. Similarly, IMI is most commonly used neonicotinoid insecticide for pest and insects management in agricultural and animal practices. Therefore the coexistence of arsenic and IMI in the environment is reality and concurrent exposure to humans and animals could be potentially hazardous.

Effect of repeated oral administrations of arsenic alone and in-conjunction with IMI on antioxidant parameters in testicular tissue

Free radicals like hydroxyl (OH), superoxide (O2·-), nitric oxide (NO·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are commonly generated by auto-oxidation processes and/or enzymatic metabolic reactions are scavenged by cellular antioxidant system [25]. Repeated oral administrations of arsenic alone or in-conjunction with IMI increased cellular metabolic reactions leading to increased generation of free radicals. The inability of enzymatic antioxidant components like CAT, SOD and GPx to scavenge these excessively produced free radicals during metabolism of toxicants may induce testicular damage as indicated by increased levels of lipid peroxidation (MDA) and protein oxidation (AOPP) product after exposure with IMI and arsenic in Wistar rats. The increasing concentration levels of arsenic in drinking water proportionately increase the AOPP and MDA levels in testes of rats [2628].

Protein and non-protein thiols (-SH group) play a significant role in scavenging free radicals including ROS. Thiols protect cellular components from oxidative insults either by direct scavenging of the free radicals and/or acts as the substrate for various antioxidant enzymes like SOD, GPx and GST [29]. In the present study, a significant reduction in the level of TTH in testicular tissue of rats exposed either to arsenic alone at 150 ppb or in concurrently exposed groups may be primary contributor of oxidative insults in testicular tissue. The replenishment of GSH during oxidative stress can be achieved by either increasing its biosynthesis or recycling by the activity of GR [30]. In the present study, reduction in the activity of GR may be responsible for the failure in replenishment resulting in the reduced level of GSH which decreases the direct and indirect scavenging of free radicals during intoxication [30]. The reduction in the activity of enzymes utilizing glutathione as a substrate (SOD, GPx and GST) may be due to the reduced level of thiols. The decreased antioxidant enzymes have been reported to induce oxidative damage of cellular membranes of spermatozoa due to generated free radicals which inhibit their number and increase their abnormality rate [31, 32]. Arsenic exposure along with IMI administration to Wistar rats produced a more profound decrease in antioxidant enzymatic activities than the administrations of either IMI or arsenic which is in consonance with reported findings [26].

The increased free radicals interact with the cellular proteins and lipids leading to the peroxidation as indicated by increased levels of MDA and AOPP in rats administered with arsenic (150 ppb) alone or in the combination of Arsenic at various concentrations with IMI administered group. These results are in accordance with the reported findings on interaction studies of insecticides and metals [3335]. Administration of both IMI and arsenic induce significant fall in tissue levels TTH as compared to the sole administration of toxicants. Co-exposure of rats to IMI and arsenic may have generated excessive free radicals in testicular tissue and its sub-cellular compartments which may have resulted in depletion of antioxidants, as indicated with decreased TTH level in testes [36].

The significant increase in the lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation product was observed testicular tissue of the IMI administered group. These observations have also been in agreement with the finding reported in the male reproductive system following administrations of insecticides [33, 37]. The exposure of arsenic through drinking water also induces a significant rise in MDA and AOPP levels in the testes of Wistar rats. Various studies have also reported similar results on chemical induced oxidative damage in testes [28, 38, 39]. Concurrent exposure of both the toxicants produced a more significant increase in lipid and protein oxidation levels as compared to individual administration of either toxicant. The testes are rich in PUFA and prone to lipid peroxidation [40]. Peroxidation of membrane lipids can result in disruption of cell structural integrity [41] leading to cellular damage. Hence, the increase in MDA and AOPP levels caused by both the toxicants in the rat testes suggests peroxidation of PUFA in testicular cells, which can cause impairment of normal testicular and sperm abnormalities [41].

Histopathology alterations in testes

Microscopic examination of testes in rats of control group revealed normal mature seminiferous tubules with complete series of spermatogenesis and high spermatozoa concentration in the lumen. However, repeated oral administrations of IMI alone in rats showed progressive congestion in blood vessels and mild oedema in the interstitial space. IMI and arsenic in drinking water induced mild to severe degenerative changes of germ cells in testes of Wistar rats [34]. Increased concentration of arsenic along with IMI induced severe testicular necrosis characterized by tubular shrinkage, decreased lumen diameter along with generalized necrosis and depletion of germ cells. More severe changes were appreciable in animals co-exposed with arsenic at 150 ppb along with IMI made tubules severely necrotic with only remnants of fibrillar necrotic debris seen in testicular sections. The pronounced histopathological alterations are further corroborated by the increased levels of MDA, AOPP and reduced TTH and antioxidant defence increased the testicular tissue damage in Wistar rats. Similarly, another insecticide like acetamiprid administration produced vacuolization of the seminiferous tubules with a reduced number of spermaids and interstitial Leydig cells in the testes of Wistar rats [42]. These results were similar to the effects of β-cypermethrin in male mice [43]. However, α-cypermethrin has been reported to induce oedema between the seminiferous tubules and vacuolization of the tubules in male mice [44, 45].

Arsenic exposure has been reported to produce ruptured follicles and few follicles showed a reduction in the number of spermatozoa in the testes of male albino rats [46]. In present study arsenic along with IMI showed severe degenerative changes in seminiferous tubules, tubular shrinkage, decreased lumen diameter with generalized necrosis and depletion of germ cells which became more prominent with the increasing concentration of arsenic doses in the combination groups and such observed alterations are in agreement with reported findings [32, 33, 47].

Conclusion

The finding of the present study suggests that repeated oral administrations of arsenic or IMI alone produce testicular damage in male Wistar rats. Reduced antioxidant enzymatic activities, increased MDA, AOPP levels and severe histopathological alterations in testes observed following concurrent repeated exposure indicated that IMI potentiated the arsenic-induced testicular toxicity in Wistar rats.

Abbreviations

AOPP: 

Advanced oxidation protein product

CAT: 

Catalase

GPx: 

Glutathione peroxidase

GR: 

Glutathione reductase

GST: 

Glutathione-s-transferase

IMI : 

Imidacloprid

MDA: 

Malondialdehyde

SOD: 

Superoxide dismutase

TTH: 

Total thiols

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the Head, Division of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, R S Pura, Jammu for providing necessary facilities for conducting the research.

Funding

Part of Master’s thesis and no additional funding was obtained for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the University database and also with the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

L. Mahajan – Planning and execution of research work. P. K. Verma – Experimental design and statistical analysis of research work. R. Raina – Supervision and interpretation. S. Sood – Histopathological study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted on healthy male Wistar rats and the experimental protocol was dully approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) vide letter no AU/ANN/13–14/IAEC/143–54, dated 24/05/2013 (Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu).

Competing interests

The authors declares that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, R S Pura, Jammu, 181102, India
(2)
Division of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, R S Pura, Jammu, 181102, India
(3)
Division of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, R S Pura, Jammu, 181102, India
(4)
Division of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, R S Pura, Jammu, 181102, India

References

  1. Kumar S. Occupational exposure associated with reproductive dysfunction. J Occup Health. 2004;46(1):1–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yeung BH, Wan HT, Law AY, Wong CK. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: multiple effects on testicular signalling and spermatogenesis. Spermatogenesis. 2011;1(3):231–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Rana SV. Perspectives in endocrine toxicity of heavy metals--a review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014;160(1):1–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamanti-kandarakis E, Bourguignon JP, Giudice LC, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2009;30(4):293–342.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mantovani A, Maranghi F. Risk assessment of chemicals potentially affecting male fertility. Contraception. 2005;72(4):308–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mandal TK, Das NS. Testicular gametogenic and steroidogenic activities in chlorpyrifos insecticide-treated rats: a correlation study with testicular oxidative stress and role of antioxidant enzyme defence systems in Sprague-Dawley rats. Andrologia. 2012;44(2):102–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Solecki R. Pesticide residues in food. Toxicological evaluations- Imidacloprid. J med plants res. 2001:1–34.Google Scholar
  8. Kacmar P, Pistl J, Mikula I. Immunotoxicology and veterinary medicine. Acta veterinaria. 1999;68:57–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. ATSDR. CERCLA priority list of hazardous substances. Agency for Toxic substances and disease registry. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human services; 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Ali S, Chaspoul F, Anderson L, et al. Mapping fifteen trace elements in human seminal plasma and sperm DNA. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2017;175(2):244–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Naziroğlu M, Kutluhan S, Uğuz AC, Celik O, Bal R, Butterworth PJ. Topiramate and vitamin E modulate the electroencephalographic records, brain microsomal and blood antioxidant redox system in pentylentetrazol-induced seizure of rats. J Membr Biol. 2009;229(3):131–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nagda G, Bhatt DK. Alleviation of lindane induced toxicity in testes of swiss mice (Mus musculus) by combined treatment with vitamin C, vitamin E and alpha-lipoic acid. Ind J Exper Biol. 2011;49(3):191–9.Google Scholar
  13. Kovacic P, Somanathan R. Novel, unifying mechanism for mescaline in the central nervous system: electrochemistry, catechol redox metabolite, receptor, cell signaling and structure activity relationships. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2009;2(4):181–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Turner TT, Lysiak JJ. Oxidative stress: a common factor in testicular dysfunction. J Androl. 2008;29(5):488–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mathur PP, D'cruz SC. The effect of environmental contaminants on testicular function. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(4):585–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Steinmaus CM, Yuan Y, Smith AH. The temporal stability of arsenic concentrations in well water in western Nevada. Environ Res. 2005;99(2):164–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shafiq-ur-rehman. Lead-induced regional lipid peroxidation in brain. Toxicol Lett. 1984;21:333–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Witko-sarsat V, Friedlander M, Capeillère-blandin C, et al. Advanced oxidation protein products as a novel marker of oxidative stress in uremia. Kidney Int. 1996;49(5):1304–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Motchnik AP, Frei B, Ames NB (1994) Measurement of antioxidants in human blood plasma, protein thiols. In: packer L, eds. Oxygen radicals in biological systems, methods in enzymology. California, Academic Press 234(D):273–274.Google Scholar
  20. Aebi HE. Catalase. In: Bergmeyer HU, editor. Methods of enzymatic analysis. New York: Academic Press; 1983. p. 276–86.Google Scholar
  21. Marklund S, Marklund G. Involvement of superoxide anion radical in autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem. 1974;47:469–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hafeman DG, Sunde RA, Hoekstra WG. Effect of dietary selenium on erythrocyte and liver glutathione peroxidase in the rat. J Nutr. 1974;104(5):580–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974;249(22):7130–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Carlberg I, Mannervik B. Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1975;250(14):5475–4580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Circu ML, Aw TY. Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:749–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Aggarwal M, Naraharisetti SB, Sarkar SN, Rao GS, Degen GH, Malik JK. Effects of subchronic coexposure to arsenic and endosulfan on the erythrocytes of broiler chickens: a biochemical study. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009;56(1):139–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan S, Telang AG, Malik JK. Arsenic-induced oxidative stress, apoptosis and alterations in testicular steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis in wistar rats: ameliorative effect of curcumin. Wudpecker J Pharmacy Pharmacol. 2013;2(3):33–48.Google Scholar
  28. Sumedha NC, Miltonprabhu S. Diallyl trisulfide (DATS) abrogates arsenic induced testicular oxidative stress in rats. Int J Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;2(2):30–7.Google Scholar
  29. Lushchak VI. Glutathione homeostasis and functions: potential targets for medical interventions. J Amino Acids. 2012;736837Google Scholar
  30. Johnson WM, Wilson-delfosse AL, Mieyal JJ. Dysregulation of glutathione homeostasis in neurodegenerative diseases. Nutrients. 2012;4(10):1399–440.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittal M, Flora SJ. Vitamin E supplementation protects oxidative stress during arsenic and fluoride antagonism in male mice. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2007;30(3):263–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bal R, Türk G, Tuzcu M, et al. Assessment of imidacloprid toxicity on reproductive organ system of adult male rats. J Environ Sci Health B. 2012;47(5):434–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Aggarwal M, Wangikar PB, Sarkar SN, et al. Effects of low-level arsenic exposure on the developmental toxicity of anilofos in rats. J Appl Toxicol. 2007;27(3):255–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lonare M, Kumar M, Raut S, et al. Evaluation of ameliorative effect of curcumin on imidacloprid-induced male reproductive toxicity in wistar rats. Environ Toxicol. 2016;31(10):1250–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Olayinka ET, Ore A. Hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity and oxidative stress in rat testes following exposure to Haloxyfop-p-methyl ester, an arylphenoxypropionate herbicide. Toxics. 2015;3:373–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Tomizawa M, Casida JE. Selective toxicity of neonicotinoids attributable to the specificity of insect and mammalian nicotinic receptors. Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:339–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Taib IS, Budin SB, Ghazali AR, Jayusman PA, Louis SR, Mohamed J. Fenitrothion induced oxidative stress and morphological alterations of sperm and testes in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(1):93–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Muthumani M, Miltonprabhu S. Silibinin ameliorates oxidative stress-mediated testicular damage by arsenic in rats. Asian Pacific J Tropical Biomed. 2012;1:1–7.Google Scholar
  39. Kumar BA, Reddy AG, Kumar PR, Reddy YR, Rao TM, Haritha C. Protective role of N-acetyl L-cysteine against reproductive toxicity due to interaction of lead and cadmium in male wistar rats. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4(2):414–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Aitken RJ, Roman SD. Antioxidant systems and oxidative stress in the testes. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2008;1(1):15–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Bell M, Sikka S, Rajasekaran M, Hellstrom W. Time course of hydrogen peroxide induced changes in the lipid peroxidation of human sperm membranes. Adv Contracept Deliv Syst. 1992;8(1–2):144–1450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lenzi A, Gandini L, Picardo M, Tramer F, Sandri G, Panfili E. Lipoperoxidation damage of spermatozoa polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA): scavenger mechanisms and possible scavenger therapies. Front Biosci. 2000;5:E1–E15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang JJ, Wang Y, Xiang H, Li M, Li W, Ma K, Wang X, Zhang J. Oxidative stress: role in acetamiprid-induced impairment of the male ice reproductive system. Agri Sci China. 2011;10(5):786–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang XZ, Liu SS, Sun Y, Wu JY, Zhou YL, Zhang JH. Beta-cypermethrin impairs reproductive function in male mice by inducing oxidative stress. Theriogenology. 2009;72(5):599–611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Manna S, Bhattacharyya D, Mandal TK, Das S. Repeated dose toxicity of alfa-cypermethrin in rats. J Vet Sci. 2004;5(3):241–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. El-demerdash FM, Yousef MI, Radwan FM. Ameliorating effect of curcumin on sodium arsenite-induced oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation in different rat organs. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47(1):249–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Dopp E, Hartmann LM, Florea AM, et al. Uptake of inorganic and organic derivatives of arsenic associated with induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;201(2):156–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement