Skip to main content
Download PDF

Disulfiram inhibits liver fibrosis in rats by suppressing hepatic stellate cell activation and viability

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology volume 23, Article number: 54 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Liver fibrosis is a wound-healing response to chronic injury, featuring with excess accumulation of extracellular matrix secreted by the activated hepatic stellate cells (HSC). Disulfiram (DSF), also known as Antabuse, has been used for the treatment of alcohol addiction and substance abuse. Recently, overwhelming studies had revealed anti-cancer effects of DSF in multiple cancers, including liver cancer. But the actual effects of DSF on liver fibrosis and liver function remain unknown.

Methods

In this study, we evaluated the effects of low-dose DSF in CCl4- and Bile Duct Ligation (BDL)—induced hepatic fibrosis rat models. Cell proliferation was detected by using the Cell-Light™ EdU Apollo®567 Cell Tracking Kit. Cell apoptosis was analyzed using a TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) kit, viability was measured with Cell Counting Kit-8(CCK8). Relative mRNA expression of pro-fibrogenic was assessed using quantitative RT-PCR. The degree of liver fibrosis, activated HSCs, were separately evaluated through Sirius Red-staining, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and asparagine aminotransferase (AST) activities were detected with ALT and AST detecting kits using an automated analyzer.

Results

Liver fibrosis was distinctly attenuated while liver functions were moderately ameliorated in the DSF-treated group. Activation and proliferation of primary rat HSCs isolated from rat livers were significantly suppressed by low-dose DSF. DSF also inhibited the viability of in vitro cultured rat or human HSC cells dose-dependently but had no repressive role on human immortalized hepatocyte THLE-2 cells. Interestingly, upon DSF treatment, the viability of LX-2 cells co-cultured with THLE-2 was significantly inhibited, while that of THLE-2 co-cultured with LX-2 was increased. Further study indicated that HSCs apoptosis was increased in DSF/CCl4-treated liver samples. These data indicated that DSF has potent anti-fibrosis effects and protective effects toward hepatocytes and could possibly be repurposed as an anti-fibrosis drug in the clinic.

Conclusions

DSF attenuated ECM remodeling through suppressing the transformation of quiet HSCs into proliferative, fibrogenic myofibroblasts in hepatic fibrosis rat models. DSF provides a novel approach for the treatment of liver fibrosis.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hepatic fibrosis is deleterious and represents the common consequence of chronic liver diseases, which gives rise to a high risk of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma morbidity [1]. The persistent activation of the inflammatory response during chronic liver diseases induces activation of HSCs and results in excessive accumulation of scar tissues [2]. Over a long period, hepatic fibrosis has been defined as irreversible. However, more and more evidence has indicated that the direction of hepatic fibrosis might be turned over by various therapeutic strategies [3,4,5]. Unfortunately, the current treatment of hepatic fibrosis still lacks specificity and sensitivity.

Disulfiram (DSF) could inhibit the activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) to cause “disulfiram reaction” [6]. And due to the well-established pharmacokinetics, DSF has been recorded as an excellent safety profile, with rarely happened side effects [7, 8]. Recently, it has been reported that DSF has anti-cancer activities on several human cancers, including liver cancer [9,10,11,12,13], through its inhibition effects on ALDH. DSF has also been reported to combat diet-induced obesity in mice through the normalization of body weight [14]. The currently available oral version of DSF is quickly reduced to diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC) and degraded in the blood. One report using in vitro cultured HSC cell lines showed that DDC restrained collagen synthesis in HSCs via decreasing the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [15]. However, in vivo effects of DSF on hepatic fibrogenesis have not been elucidated.

In this study, we uncovered that low-dose DSF reduced the accumulation of collagen deposition in both CCl4- and BDL- induced hepatic fibrosis models. DSF alleviated liver fibrosis by suppressing the activation and viability of HSCs. Our results provided evidence that DSF might be a new candidate for clinical anti-fibrosis treatment.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and reagents

HSC-T6 cell was from the cell bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and LX-2 was deposited in Shanghai Cancer Institute. THLE-2 was from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and cultured according to ATCC protocols. Disulfiram was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, USA).

Animal experiments

Animal experiments were performed as previously described [16]. Adult male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (about 200 g) were used for CCl4- or BDL-induced models. 16 rats were given intraperitoneal injections of 0.2 ml CCl4 diluted 1:1 in olive oil twice weekly and lasted for 8 weeks. One week after the first injection of CCl4, SD rats were randomly divided into two groups, one group received CCl4/vehicle and the other received CCl4/DSF intraperitoneally (n = 8 in each group). Similarly, rats were divided into two groups one week after BDL procedure and received DSF or vehicle treatment. DSF was dissolved with DMSO and injected twice a week (4 mg/kg body weight). Rats were euthanized by inhaling carbon dioxide in their cages and sacrificed 48 h after the last DSF injection. Rats were manipulated and housed according to protocols approved by the East China Normal University Animal Care Commission. All animals received human care according to the criteria outlined in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health.

Isolation and culturing of rat HSCs

We used male SD rats (250 ~ 300 g) and a two-step collagenase/pronase E perfusion of rat livers followed by 18% Nycodenz two-layer discontinuous density-gradient centrifugation to isolate rHSCs. Briefly, rats were anesthetized and the vena cava and the vena porta were exposed. The vena porta was cut and inserted with a fine cannula which was placed properly and ligatured. The aorta abdominalis was cut after the first drops of blood out of the cannula, and then the liver was immediately in situ rinsed with sterilized Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS, without Ca2 + /Mg2 + , 37 °C) at a flow rate of 10 mL/min until liver turned grey. Subsequently, the liver was perfused with 90 mL of pronase E solution (Sigma, flow rate 10 mL/min, 37 °C), followed by 50 mL collagenase solution (Sigma, 37 °C) until the liver is greatly destroyed. The liver was further digested with 0.01 mg/ml DNase I solution containing 1% penicillin–streptomycin and separated into small pieces. Cell suspension was filtered through sterilized nylon meshes (100 μm) and subjected to centrifuge and resuspended in ice-cold HBSS (with Ca2 + /Mg2 +). Then Nycodenz (Sigma) density gradient centrifugation was performed (450 g, 4 °C) and isolated HSC cells were suspended in DMEM glutamax (Gibco) supplemented with 20% FBS and cultured on plastic dishes. Cells were replaced with fresh media every other day. Differential interference contrast images of cells were captured with a 20X objective lens at the indicated time points.

Measurement of liver enzymes

Rat blood was collected in Eppendorf tubes and standing in 4℃overnight, followed by centrifugation at 3000 rpm/min for 20 min. The serum was collected and stored at -80℃. Serum ALT and AST activities were detected with ALT and AST detecting kits (Shen Suo You Fu Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) using an automated analyzer.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Takara, China) and reverse-transcribed with the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (Takara, China). Quantitative PCR was performed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Japan). The primer sequences used were: ColI1a1, forward 5’CAGGCTGGTGTGATGGGATT3’, reverse 5’CCAAGGTCTCCAGGAACACC3’, TIMP1, forward 5’GACCACCTTATACCAGCGTT 3’, reverse 5’GTCACTCTCCAGTTTGCAAG3’, Acta2, forward 5’GGACGTACAACTGGTATTGTGC3’, reverse 5’CGGCAGTAGTCACGAAGGAAT3’, GAPDH, forward 5’GCTGAGTATGTCGTGGAGTCT3’, reverse 5’GGTTCACACCCATCACAAACA3’. Gene expression values were calculated based on the -△Ct method and normalized to GAPDH. Results were calculated as 2 −△Ct and normalized to the control group.

Cell proliferation and viability assay

Cell proliferation was detected by measuring active DNA synthesis using the Cell-Light™ EdU Apollo®567 Cell Tracking Kit (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China). Isolated rHSCs were seeded in 48-well plates containing round coverslips at a density of 5000 cells/well and cultured for 2 days. Then the cells were pre-treated with vehicle or DSF for 48 h, followed by EdU incubation for another 48 h. Then the cells were fixed and visualized for EdU incorporation.

For cell viability assay, 100 μl of cell suspension (2000 cells/well) was inoculated in a 96-well plate. After incubation for 24 h, cells were treated with various concentrations of DSF for 48 h. Viability was detected with Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo Molecular Technologies). Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated twice.

For co-culture assay, 500 μl cell suspension of LX-2 (1*104 cells/well) was inoculated in a 24-well transwell plate as LX-2 only, or co-cultured with 200 μl THLE-2 (5*104 cells) cells inoculated in the upper chamber (pore size 0.4 μm). 12 h later, cells were replaced with 100 nM DSF or vehicle-containing medium and incubated for another 48 h. Then, the viabilities of LX-2 on the plate were detected using CCK-8. Reversely, to detect THLE-2 viability cocultured with LX-2, THLE-2 cells were inoculated below on the plate and LX-2 cells were on the upper chamber. Similarly, co-culture cells were treated with DSF or control and viabilities of THLE-2 were measured. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated twice.

Sirius-red staining, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

Preparation and staining of liver specimens were performed as previously reported [16]. Briefly, liver specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Then the sections were stained in 0.1% Sirius Red F3BA in a saturated picric acid solution. Randomly selected five fields from each section were photographed and analyzed. Red staining areas were quantified using NIH ImageJ software and expressed as a percentage of the total analyzed areas.

For immunohistochemical staining, primary antibodies for α-SMA (clone 1A4; Sigma-Aldrich), CD45 (PA5-87,427, Invitrogen) were incubated, followed by incubation of species-matched secondary antibody labelled with HRP (Thermo Scientific, USA) and detection with DAB substrate (Thermo Scientific). The nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin.

For immunofluorescence, cells were cultured on BD Falcon™ 8-well Culture Slides, fixed and permeabilized, incubated with anti-alpha-SMA antibody and species-matched secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor-594. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma). Cell apoptosis was analyzed using a TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) kit (R&D Systems, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means ± SD. The student’s t-test was used for comparison between groups. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

DSF alleviates liver fibrosis and liver injury in CCl4-induced rat hepatic fibrosis model

To directly investigate the effects of DSF during hepatic fibrogenesis, we established a CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis model using adult male SD rats. One week after the first injection of CCl4, SD rats were randomly divided into two groups, one group received CCl4/vehicle and the other received CCl4 supplemented with low-dose DSF intraperitoneally (4 mg/kg body weight, n = 8 in each group). The definition of low-dose DSF was referred to and calculated according to previous reports [14, 17]. After 7 weeks, the rats were sacrificed and the livers were dissected and fixed. The degree of liver fibrosis was evaluated through quantification of Sirius Red-stained collagen areas in rat liver tissues. Compared with the control group, collagen deposition was significantly reduced in the DSF-treatment group (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of DSF on CCl4-induced fibrosis in rats. A Representative images of liver tissues stained with Sirius Red, α-SMA and CD45. Collagen deposition was indicated by the red strands. Statistical analysis of Sirus red-positive collagen per field was shown on the right panel. Scale bar, 50 μm. B Relative mRNA expression of pro-fibrogenic markers in liver, measured using qPCR. C Serum ALT and AST levels in DSF-treated and control group (n = 5). Data were expressed as means ± SD. *, P < 0.05

Full size image

Activation of HSCs has been recognized as a sign of hepatic fibrosis. Therefore, Actin Alpha 2, Smooth Muscle (ACTA2, also called α-SMA), a characteristic protein of HSC activation, was detected in rat liver specimens by immunohistochemical staining. The results showed that α-SMA staining was much weaker in DSF-treatment group compared to the control group (Fig. 1A). Given fibrogenesis is developed under close crosstalk between damaged hepatocytes, immune cells and HSCs, we detected the overall immune cells and found that CD45 positive cells were moderately decreased in DSF-treated group compared to the control group (Fig. 1A). Next, the levels of classical profibrogenic and hepatic function markers were examined. As shown in Fig. 1B, the expression levels of α-SMA, collagen type 1 α1 (Coll1a1), and TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP1) were reduced in DSF-treated group. And notable reductions in ALT and AST levels were detected in rats treated with DSF (Fig. 1C). These data indicated that DSF has a protective effect on CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis and liver injury.

DSF reduces BDL-induced hepatic fibrogenesis

Next, the BDL-induced liver fibrosis model was used to verify the effects of DSF on hepatic fibrosis. Consistent with the results in the CCl4-induced liver fibrosis model, BDL-induced liver fibrosis was also remarkably reduced via long-term and low-dose DSF treatment, as revealed by Sirius Red and α-SMA staining (Fig. 2A). Infiltration of CD45( +) overall immune cells were also moderately decreased by DSF treatment in this model (Fig. 2A). Quantitative PCR analysis further confirmed the reduced expression of α-SMA in DSF-treated group (Fig. 2B). Further, we found the serum level of AST but not ALT was decreased by DSF treatment (Fig. 2C). These findings confirmed that DSF attenuated rat hepatic fibrosis in vivo.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of DSF on BDL-induced fibrosis in rats. A Representative images of liver tissues stained with Sirius Red, α-SMA and CD45. Statistical analysis of Sirus red-positive collagen per field was shown on the right panel. Scale bar, 50 μm. B Relative mRNA expression of α-SMA in liver, measured using qPCR. C Serum ALT and AST levels in DSF-treated and control group (n = 5). Data were shown as means ± SD. *, P < 0.05

Full size image

DSF inhibits the activation and viability of primary rat HSCs in vitro

To investigate the effects of disulfiram on primary HSCs activation, we isolated rat HSCs (rHSCs) and cultured with DMEM/20%FBS on plastic dishes. Then, cells were changed with fresh complete medium containing vehicle control, or different concentrations of DSF every other day. To determine the effects of disulfiram on morphological changes associated with rHSCs activation, we monitored cell morphology at 3, 6 and 8 days after isolation. Cells treated with vehicles appeared to undergo the typical activation process of HSCs. These cells exhibited enlarged cellular bodies with increased cell numbers after 6 days of culture (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

DSF inhibits the activation and viability of primary rHSCs in vitro. A Bright-field images of control and DSF-treated rHSCs at days 3, 6 and 8 of culture. Scale bar, 50 μm. B DSF-treated and control rHSCs were immunostained with α-SMA antibodies and DAPI. Quantified analysis of α-SMA intensities was shown below. *, P < 0.05 Scale bar, 25 μm. C EdU incorporation and quantification. EdU-positive cells were imaged on the left and quantified on the right panel. Scale bar, 50 μm. D Viabilities of rHSCs incubated with different concentrations of DSF **, P < 0.01

Full size image

On the contrary, in DSF treatment groups, rHSCs activation was clearly suppressed with minimal morphological changes, especially in 100 nM DSF treated group (Fig. 3A). Moreover, α-SMA staining confirmed that rHSCs in the DSF treatment group were less activated than those in the control group, with weaker α-SMA and smaller cell sizes (Fig. 3B).

To investigate the effects of DSF on HSC proliferation, primary rHSCs were seeded in 48-well plates containing round coverslips and cultured for 2 days. Then the cells were pre-treated with vehicle control or 100 nM DSF for 48 h, followed by EdU incubation for another 48 h. As shown in Fig. 3C, EdU incorporation was distinctly decreased in the rHSCs treated with DSF. Primary rHSCs were also inoculated in 96-well plates and treated with different concentrations of DSF (0, 10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM, 10 μM) for 24 h. The results showed that DSF inhibited primary HSCs viabilities dose-dependently, and 100 nM of DSF was sufficient to suppress primary HSCs viability (Fig. 3D). These data demonstrated that DSF inhibits the activation and proliferation of primary rHSCs dose-dependently.

DSF inhibits the viability of HSCs but has minimal toxicity on hepatocytes

Next, we investigated the effects of DSF on HSC cell lines. We found DSF also inhibited the viability of rat HSC cell line HSC-T6 and human HSC cell line LX-2 dose-dependently (Fig. 4A, B). Interestingly, DSF treatment did not suppress the viability of THLE-2, an immortalized hepatocyte cell line, even at a high concentration of 10 μM (Fig. 4C). To mimic the in vivo condition, LX-2 cells were inoculated in a 24-well transwell plate as LX-2 only, or co-cultured with THLE-2 cells (LX-2 down vs THLE-2 upper chamber, cell ratio, 1: 5). 12 h later, cells were replaced with 100 nM DSF or vehicle-containing medium and incubated for another 48 h. The result showed that the viability of LX-2 co-cultured with THLE-2 is evidently increased compared to LX-2 only, while it was significantly inhibited by DSF treatment (Fig. 4D, left).

Fig. 4
figure 4

DSF inhibits the viability of HSCs but has minimal toxicity on hepatocytes. A Viability of HSC-6 T treated with increasing concentrations of DSF or control. B, C The viability of LX-2 (B) and THLE-2 (C) cells treated with DSF or control. D Cell viabilities of LX-2 only, or LX-2 co-cultured with THLE-2 treated with DSF or vehicle (left), and that of THLE-2 only, or THLE-2 co-cultured with LX-2 treated with DSF or vehicle (right). E, F HSC-T6 cell apoptosis was detected by TUNEL staining. Scale bar, 50 μm. The ratios of apoptotic cells were analyzed below. G Immunofluorescence staining of α-SMA (red) and TUNEL (green) in CCl4-induced fibrotic rat liver tissues. Close-up images were shown in the while rectangle. Scale bar, 25 μm. TUNEL-positive HSCs per field were analyzed on the right. White arrows indicated apoptotic HSCs and white arrowheads indicated hepatocytes. **, P < 0.01

Full size image

Reversely, to answer whether DSF suppressed hepatocyte viability in a condition mimics in vivo liver tissue, THLE-2 only, or co-cultured with LX-2 was inoculated (THLE-2 down vs LX-2 upper, cell ratio, 5: 1) and treated with DSF as described above. The viability of THLE-2 co-cultured with LX-2 was increased compared with THLE-2 only, while it was surprisingly further increased by DSF treatment (Fig. 4D, right). These results indicate that DSF specifically inhibits the viability of HSCs in co-cultured status with a potential protective effect toward hepatocytes.

Next, using TUNEL staining, we investigated whether DSF promotes the apoptosis of activated HSCs. We found that the apoptosis ratio of HSC-T6 was significantly increased by 100 nM DSF in vitro (Fig. 4E, F). Moreover, CCl4-induced fibrotic rat liver tissues were subjected to co-immunofluorescence of α-SMA (red) and TUNEL (green) staining to simultaneously label HSCs and apoptotic cells. The results showed that the number of TUNEL-positive cells in α-SMA positive fibrosis regions was significantly higher in DSF-treated group than that in vehicle-treated group (Fig. 4G). These results indicated that DSF promotes apoptosis of active HSCs in vitro and in vivo.

Discussion

The progress from chronic injury to liver fibrosis is accompanied by activation of hepatic myofibroblasts and ECM remodelling. With the increasing understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying liver fibrogenesis, novel strategies for blocking or reversing the fibrogenic progression are being investigated. Many antifibrotic agents have been proved to be effective in vitro or animal models, and several compounds showed safety profiles in phase 1 clinical studies [18], however, none has been approved in clinic practice. Another strategy to discover new antifibrotic drugs is to filtrate from existing agents used to cure other diseases [18, 19]. The benefit of this strategy is that many resources can be saved in analyzing the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of drugs.

DSF is an ALDH inhibitor, which is approved by the FDA for treating alcohol addiction [8]. DSF is able to suppress tumor growth through inhibition of proteasome activity [20, 21], abrogation of drug resistance [11, 22], or elimination of stem cell-like properties [23]. Recently, DSF is considered as an important drug for future HIV cure strategies, given its’ reversal effect on HIV latency [24]. By using CCl4- and BDL-induced rat hepatic fibrogenesis models, we found that DSF significantly attenuated liver fibrosis and hepatic injury. Subsequent assays indicated that DSF inhibited activation and proliferation of HSCs, and induced apoptosis of activated rat HSCs. Thus, DSF might be a good candidate to target HSC for suppressing liver fibrosis.

DSF has been recorded an excellent safety profile with rarely happened side effects [7, 8]. Liver failure was a much rare event for complicated reasons in humans receiving DSF, and it had not been observed in rats. To avoid possible toxicity, we used a much lower dose of DSF with long-term treatment in CCl4 and BDL models (4 mg/kg), compared to the doses in numerous reports in rats [25,26,27] and human trials[28,29,30]. Full-process administration of low-dose DSF may be more effective in inhibiting fibrosis, but higher dose of DSF administrated at a later stage might also work, which can be investigated in future.

The toxic concentration of DSF to hepatocytes is beyond micro-moles as revealed by in vitro studies in the literature [31, 32]. In this study, we applicated different concentrations of DSF and several sources of HSC to measure the effects on HSCs viabilities, and revealed the lowest concentration of DSF that effectively inhibited HSC viabilities. Excitingly, cytotoxicity was not observed in DSF-treated THLE-2 cells even at a concentration of 10 μM. And THLE-2 viability was even enhanced by DSF treatment while coculture with LX2, indicating that DSF specifically targets HSC with minimal toxicity on hepatocytes.

Coculture data also demonstrate that the crosstalk between hepatocytes and HSCs enhances their survival. These data are consistent with what we found in rat fibrosis models. Therefore, DSF has a distinctive anti-fibrosis effect through inhibiting HSCs activation and protecting hepatocytes. Nevertheless, the safety of DSF could be further confirmed by including a group of healthy control in the fibrosis models. And further investigations are needed to confirm the pro-apoptosis role of DSF by detecting the apoptosis signaling cascades and to reveal the underlying mechanisms of how DSF regulates HSC survival.

ALDH2 deficiency accentuated CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis via ROS overproduction [33], while ALDH2−/− mice were prone to get liver inflammation and fibrosis through malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde induced paracrine IL-6 activation in Kupffer cells [34]. Thus, as an ALDH inhibitor, DSF seems to aggravate fibrogenesis. However, our results showed that DSF suppressed hepatic fibrosis progression by inhibiting myofibroblast-like features of HSCs. Since ALDH is not the only target of DSF, we speculate that DSF might regulate HSCs activation through other mechanisms. It was reported that DSF administration resulted in the inhibition of CYP2E1 [35]. And several reports revealed that upregulated CYP2E1 in hepatocytes contributes to HSCs activation and fibrosis [36,37,38]. Thus, CYP2E1 might play a critical role in DSF-triggered antifibrotic progression, which needs further investigations.

Immune cells were recruited upon liver injury to mediate HSC activation during fibrogenesis[39]. Excessive inflammation was observed in CCl4- and BDL-induced fibrotic livers which were moderately reduced by DSF treatment. Thus, DSF might also directly suppress the infiltration of immune cells or reduce liver inflammation through inhibiting liver injury.

Conclusions

As a treatment for alcohol addiction being used for over six decades, DSF has shown promising application prospects in other diseases including tumors. For the first time, we uncovered that DSF attenuated ECM remodeling through suppressing the transform of quiet HSCs into proliferative, fibrogenic myofibroblasts in hepatic fibrosis rat models. Our study indicated the antifibrotic effects of DSF, providing a novel approach for the treatment of liver fibrosis.

Availability of data and materials

All data used to support the finding of this study are included within the article.

Abbreviations

DSF:

Disulfiram

HSCs:

Hepatic Stellate Cells

ECM:

Extracellular Matrix

ALDH:

Aldehyde Dehydrogenase

ROS:

Reactive Oxygen Species

BDL:

Bile Duct Ligation

ALT:

Alanine Aminotransferase

AST:

Asparagine Aminotransferase

SMA:

Smooth Muscle Actin

References

  1. Friedman SL. Liver fibrosis – from bench to bedside. J Hepatol. 2003;38(Suppl 1):S38-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yin C, Evason KJ, Asahina K, Stainier DY. Hepatic stellate cells in liver development, regeneration, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1902–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zoubek ME, Trautwein C, Strnad P. Reversal of liver fibrosis: From fiction to reality. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;31:129–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhan L, Huang C, Meng XM, Song Y, Wu XQ, Yang Y, Li J. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in hepatic fibrosis: A promising therapeutic target. Biochimie. 2015;108:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cai SP, Cheng XY, Chen PJ, Pan XY, Xu T, Huang C, Meng XM, Li J. Transmembrane protein 88 attenuates liver fibrosis by promoting apoptosis and reversion of activated hepatic stellate cells. Mol Immunol. 2016;80:58–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Suh JJ, Pettinati HM, Kampman KM, O’Brien CP. The status of disulfiram: a half of a century later. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;26:290–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ct W. Vafier JA, Lake CR: Disulfiram-induced fulminating hepatitis: guidelines for liver-panel monitoring. J Clin Psychiatry. 1988;49:430–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suggitt M, Bibby MC. 50 years of preclinical anticancer drug screening: empirical to target-driven approaches. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:971–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu C, Li X, Ren Y, Zhang X. Disulfiram: a novel repurposed drug for cancer therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021;87:159–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen D, Cui QZC, Yang HJ, Dou QP. Disulfiram, a clinically used anti-alcoholism drug and copper-binding agent, induces apoptotic cell death in breast cancer cultures and xenografts via inhibition of the proteasome activity. Can Res. 2006;66:10425–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W, McLeod HL, Cassidy J. Disulfiram-mediated inhibition of NF-kappaB activity enhances cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2003;104:504–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Triscott J, Lee C, Hu KJ, Fotovati A, Berns R, Pambid M, Luk M, Kast RE, Kong E, Toyota E, et al. Disulfiram, a drug widely used to control alcoholism, suppresses self-renewal of glioblastoma and overrides resistance to temozolomide. Oncotarget. 2012;3:1112–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu P, Brown S, Goktug T, Channathodiyil P, Kannappan V, Hugnot JP, Guichet PO, Bian X, Armesilla AL, Darling JL, Wang W. Cytotoxic effect of disulfiram/copper on human glioblastoma cell lines and ALDH-positive cancer-stem-like cells. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1488–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernier M, Mitchell SJ, Wahl D, Diaz A, Singh A, Seo W, Wang M, Ali A, Kaiser T, Price NL, et al. Disulfiram Treatment Normalizes Body Weight in Obese Mice. Cell Metab. 2020;32(203–214):e204.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu T, Wang P, Cong M, Xu Y, Jia J, You H. The CYP2E1 inhibitor DDC up-regulates MMP-1 expression in hepatic stellate cells via an ERK1/2- and Akt-dependent mechanism. Biosci Rep. 2013;33:e00041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang YH, Li RK, Fu Y, Li J, Yang XM, Zhang YL, Zhu L, Yang Q, Gu JR, Xing X, Zhang ZG. Exemestane Attenuates Hepatic Fibrosis in Rats by Inhibiting Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells and Promoting the Secretion of Interleukin 10. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:3072745.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Palatty PL, Saldanha E. Status of disulfiram in present day alcoholic deaddiction therapy. Indian J Psychiatry. 2011;53:25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Popov Y, Schuppan D. Targeting liver fibrosis: strategies for development and validation of antifibrotic therapies. Hepatology. 2009;50:1294–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schuppan D, Pinzani M. Anti-fibrotic therapy: lost in translation? J Hepatol. 2012;56(Suppl 1):S66-74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lovborg H, Oberg F, Rickardson L, Gullbo J, Nygren P, Larsson R. Inhibition of proteasome activity, nuclear factor-KappaB translocation and cell survival by the antialcoholism drug disulfiram. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:1577–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rickardson L, Wickstrom M, Larsson R, Lovborg H. Image-based screening for the identification of novel proteasome inhibitors. J Biomol Screen. 2007;12:203–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Loo TW, Bartlett MC, Clarke DM. Disulfiram metabolites permanently inactivate the human multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein. Mol Pharm. 2004;1:426–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yip NC, Fombon IS, Liu P, Brown S, Kannappan V, Armesilla AL, Xu B, Cassidy J, Darling JL, Wang W. Disulfiram modulated ROS-MAPK and NFkappaB pathways and targeted breast cancer cells with cancer stem cell-like properties. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1564–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Knights HDJ. A Critical Review of the Evidence Concerning the HIV Latency Reversing Effect of Disulfiram, the Possible Explanations for Its Inability to Reduce the Size of the Latent Reservoir In Vivo, and the Caveats Associated with Its Use in Practice. Aids Res Treat. 2017;2017:8239428.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Milandri M, Poulsen HE, Ranek L, Andreasen PB. Effect of long-term disulfiram administration on rat liver. Pharmacology. 1980;21:76–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cetin N, Suleyman B, Altuner D, Kuyrukluyildiz U, Ozcicek F, Coskun R, Kurt N, Suleyman H. Effect of disulfiram on ketamine-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:13540–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Schroeder JP, Cooper DA, Schank JR, Lyle MA, Gaval-Cruz M, Ogbonmwan YE, Pozdeyev N, Freeman KG, Iuvone PM, Edwards GL, et al. Disulfiram attenuates drug-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking via inhibition of dopamine beta-hydroxylase. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;35:2440–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang JY, Campian JL, Gujar AD, Tsien C, Ansstas G, Tran DD, DeWees TA, Lockhart AC, Kim AH. Final results of a phase I dose-escalation, dose-expansion study of adding disulfiram with or without copper to adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2018;138:105–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelley KC, Grossman KF, Brittain-Blankenship M, Thorne KM, Akerley WL, Terrazas MC, Kosak KM, Boucher KM, Buys SS, McGregor KA, et al. A Phase 1 dose-escalation study of disulfiram and copper gluconate in patients with advanced solid tumors involving the liver using S-glutathionylation as a biomarker. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Krampe H, Ehrenreich H. Supervised Disulfiram as Adjunct to Psychotherapy in Alcoholism Treatment. Curr Pharm Design. 2010;16:2076–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheppard JG, Frazier KR, Saralkar P, Hossain MF, Geldenhuys WJ, Long TE. Disulfiram-based disulfides as narrow-spectrum antibacterial agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2018;28:1298–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Boot JH. Hepatotoxic effects of SH-reagents in human and rat hepatocyte cultures and in situ perfused rat livers. Cell Struct Funct. 1996;21:221–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwon HJ, Won YS, Park O, Chang BX, Duryee MJ, Thiele GE, Matsumoto A, Singh S, Abdelmegeed MA, Song BJ, et al. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Deficiency Ameliorates Alcoholic Fatty Liver but Worsens Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis in Mice. Hepatol. 2014;60:146–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma X, Luo Q, Zhu H, Liu XJ, Dong Z, Zhang KL, Zou YZ, Wu J, Ge JB, Sun AJ. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 activation ameliorates CCl4-induced chronic liver fibrosis in mice by up-regulating Nrf2/HO-1 antioxidant pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:3965–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Frye RF, Branch RA. Effect of chronic disulfiram administration on the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and N-acetyltransferase in healthy human subjects. Brit J Clin Pharmaco. 2002;53:155–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nieto N, Friedman SL, Cederbaum AI. Cytochrome P450 2E1-derived reactive oxygen species mediate paracrine stimulation of collagen I protein synthesis by hepatic stellate cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:9853–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nieto N, Friedman SL, Cederbaum A. Stimulation and proliferation of primary rat hepatic stellate cells by cytochrome P450 2E1-derived reactive oxygen species. Hepatology. 2002;35:62–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu J, Ma HY, Liang S, Sun MX, Karin G, Koyama Y, Hu RL, Quehenberger O, Davidson NO, Dennis EA, et al. The Role of Human Cytochrome P450 2E1 in Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis. Hepatol Commun. 2017;1:1043–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang M, Zhang S. T Cells in Fibrosis and Fibrotic Diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Yahui Wang and Junping Ao for technical supports. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81972582) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19ZR1452500).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81972582) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19ZR1452500).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiao-Mei Yang, Zheng Wu, Xiaoqi Wang and Yaoqi Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Dongchuan Road, NO. 800, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Xiao-Mei Yang, Zheng Wu, Xiaoqi Wang, Yaoqi Zhou, Lei Zhu, Dongxue Li, Hui-Zhen Nie, Ya-Hui Wang & Jun Li

  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, People’s Republic of China

    Zheng Wu

  3. Institute of Biomedical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, People’s Republic of China

    Xueyun Ma

Authors
  1. Xiao-Mei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zheng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoqi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yaoqi Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lei Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dongxue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hui-Zhen Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ya-Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xueyun Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J Li and X Ma designed the study, developed the methodology, performed the animal experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. XM Yang, Z Wu, X Wang and Y Zhou performed the in vitro experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the revised manuscript. L Zhu, D Li, HZ Nie, YH Wang offered technical support. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. XM Yang, Z Wu, X Wang and Y Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Li or Xueyun Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animals in this study were housed in Minghan Laboratory Animal Center, East China Normal University and experimental protocols were approved by the East China Normal University Animal Care Commission (ID: 2012–1204). All methods were carried out in accordance to the criteria outlined in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health. All methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines for the reporting of animal experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, XM., Wu, Z., Wang, X. et al. Disulfiram inhibits liver fibrosis in rats by suppressing hepatic stellate cell activation and viability. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 23, 54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-022-00583-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-022-00583-5

Keywords

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology

ISSN: 2050-6511

Contact us